Intelligent supervision of PIVAS drug dispensing based on image recognition technology.

Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) are places dedicated to the centralized dispensing of intravenous drugs, usually managed and operated by professional pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, and are an integral part of modern healthcare. However, the workflow of PIVAS has some problems, such as low efficiency and error-prone. This study aims to improve the efficiency of drug dispensing, reduce the rate of manual misjudgment, and minimize drug errors by conducting an in-depth study of the entire workflow of PIVAS and applying image recognition technology to the drug checking and dispensing process. Firstly, through experimental comparison, a target detection model suitable for drug category recognition is selected in the drug-checking process of PIVAS, and it is improved to improve the recognition accuracy and speed of intravenous drug categories. Secondly, a corner detection model for drug dosage recognition was studied in the drug dispensing stage to further increase drug dispensing accuracy. Then the PIVAS drug category recognition system and PIVAS drug dosage recognition system were designed and implemented.

A cohort study comparing pharmacist activities during participation in general medical ward rounds: telehealth versus in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created systemic challenges in patient care delivery. AIM: To evaluate the impact on pharmacist activities during pharmacist participation in ward rounds via telehealth, compared to physical attendance. METHOD: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study conducted from 18th Aug through 26th Oct 2020. Patients admitted to COVID and non-COVID general medical teams were included. Pharmacists attended ward rounds via telehealth for COVID teams; physical attendance continued for non-COVID teams. Telehealth involved pharmacists interacting with clinicians and patients virtually via videoconferencing whilst stationed remotely on the ward. Routine clinical pharmacy activities during telehealth ward rounds were compared to those during face-to-face ward rounds using comparative statistics. RESULTS: Among the 1230 patients included (762 COVID, 468 non-COVID), pharmacist participation in telehealth ward rounds demonstrated significantly more documented activities compared with face-to-face rounds (mean 6.7 vs 4.9 per patient per day, p < 0.001). The telehealth cohort exhibited a higher number of orders placed via pharmacy-partnered medication charting (3.0 vs 2.4 per patient per day, p < 0.001), medication orders verified (2.3 vs 1.1, p < 0.001), and documented pharmacy notes (0.6 vs 0.2, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in medication requests processed (0.4 vs 0.4, p = 738), whilst non-COVID patients had more discharge prescription items generated (0.3 vs 0.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pharmacist involvement in medical ward rounds via telehealth enabled the ongoing provision of advanced clinical pharmacy services to inpatients in isolation rooms during the COVID-19 pandemic. This approach resulted in a greater number of pharmacy activities during telehealth ward rounds compared to standard in-person attendance.

ASHP National Survey of Pharmacy Practice in Hospital Settings: Workforce - 2022.

PURPOSE: Results of the 2022 ASHP National Survey of Pharmacy Practice in Hospital Settings are presented. METHODS: Pharmacy directors at 1,498 general and children's medical/surgical hospitals in the United States were surveyed using a mixed-mode method of contact by email and mail. Survey completion was online. IQVIA supplied data on hospital characteristics; the survey sample was drawn from IQVIA's hospital database. RESULTS: The response rate was 23.7%. Inpatient pharmacists independently prescribe in 27.1% of hospitals. Advanced analytics are used in 8.7% of hospitals. Pharmacists work in ambulatory or primary care clinics in 51.6% of hospitals operating outpatient clinics. Some level of pharmacy service integration is reported in 53.6% of hospitals. More advanced pharmacy technician roles are emerging. For health systems offering hospital at home services, 65.9% of pharmacy departments are involved. Shortages of pharmacists and technicians were reported but are more acute for pharmacy technicians. Aspects of burnout are being measured in 34.0% of hospitals, and 83.7% are attempting to prevent and mitigate burnout. The average number of full-time equivalents per 100 occupied beds is 16.9 for pharmacists and 16.1 for pharmacy technicians. CONCLUSION: Health-system pharmacies are experiencing workforce shortages; however, these shortages have had limited impact on budgeted positions. Workforce challenges are influencing the work of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Adoption of practice advancement initiatives has continued the positive trend from past years despite workforce issues.

Impact of clinical pharmacist's interventions on clinical outcomes in appropriate use of colistin: a prospective pre-post intervention study.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical pharmacist's contribution impact on the appropriate use of colistin. Our study was conducted prospectively in patients in the Internal Diseases Intensive Care Unit of Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital for eight months. The first four months of the study were with the observation group, while the next four months were with the intervention group. The study determined how the active participation of clinical pharmacists had affected the appropriateness of colistin use. The results showed that the appropriate use of colistin was higher in the intervention group than in the observational group; furthermore, incidence of nephrotoxicity was lower. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.05), respectively. This study showed that the clinical pharmacist's active intervention by following the patients increased the frequency and percentage of the appropriate use of colistin. This decreased the incidence of nephrotoxicity, colistin's most important side effect.

Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI) in ICU patients working remotely with ward-based service. We evaluated both pharmacy services, including further information on PI, including reasons, actions and impact. METHOD: Over 5 months, a prospective single-centre observational study divided into two sequential phases (remote and ward-based) was performed on two ICU wards at a university hospital. After a structured medication review, PI identified were addressed to healthcare professionals. For documentation, the national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) was used. Acceptance was used as the primary endpoint. All data were analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In total, 605 PI resulted from 1023 medication reviews. Acceptance was 75% (228/304) for remote and 88% (265/301; p < 0.001) for ward-based services. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Most commonly, drug- (44% and 36%) and dose-related (36% and 35%) reasons were documented. Frequently, drugs were stopped/paused (31% and 29%) and dosage changed (31% and 30%). PI were classified as "error, no harm" (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [NCC MERP] categories B to D; 83% and 81%). The severity and clinical relevance were at least ranked as "significant" (68% and 66%) and at least as "important" for patients (77% and 83%). CONCLUSION: The way pharmacy services are provided influences the acceptance of PI. Remote pharmacy services may be seen as an addition, but acceptance rates in remote services failed to show non-inferiority.

Comparing different robots available in the European market for the preparation of injectable chemotherapy and recommendations to users.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in technology have made it possible to develop robots for preparing injectable anticancer drugs. This study aims to compare characteristics between robots available in the European market in 2022 and to help future pharmacy users in their choices. METHODS: Three sources of data were used: (1) a review of published articles in the MEDLINE database from November 2017 to end of June 2021 on chemotherapy-compounding robots used in hospital; (2) all manufacturers' documentation, and (3) demonstrations of robot operations in real hospital conditions and discussions with users and manufacturers. Robot characteristics included number of robots installed, general technical characteristics, type of injectable chemotherapy produced and compatible materials, productivity data, preparation control methods, residual manual tasks, chemical and microbiological risk management, cleaning method, software, and implementation time. RESULTS: Seven robots commercialized were studied. Several technical characteristics have to be taken into account in selecting the robot whose match the specific needs of a particular hospital, and which often require rethinking the current production workflow as well as the organization of the pharmacy unit. In addition to increasing productivity, the robots improve the quality of production thanks to better traceability, reproducibility, and precision of sampling. They also improve user protection against chemical risk, musculoskeletal disorders, and needle wounds. Nevertheless, when robotization is being planned, there are still numerous residual manual tasks to keep in mind. CONCLUSION: Robotization of the production of injectable anticancer drugs is booming within anticancer chemotherapy preparation pharmacy units. Feedback from this experience needs to be further shared with the pharmacy community regarding this significant investment.

2022 ASHP Survey of Health-System Specialty Pharmacy Practice: Clinical Services.

PURPOSE: Results of the first ASHP national survey of clinical services provided by health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) are presented. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was developed by 26 HSSP contacts after reviewing available literature on the role and services of HSSPs. After pilot and cognitive testing resulting in a final questionnaire of 119 questions, a convenience sample of 441 leaders in HSSPs was contacted using email and invited to participate in the survey. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 29%. Almost half of respondents (48%) had offered pharmacy services for 7 years or more, and most (60%) dispensed more than 15,000 prescriptions annually. Respondents most commonly (42%) reported a specialist model wherein staff are dedicated to specific specialty disease states. Over half of respondents reported providing several medication access, pretreatment assessment, and initial counseling services to patients referred to them, regardless of whether the HSSP was used for medication fulfillment. All HSSP activities were noted to be documented in the electronic health record and visible to providers frequently or always. Almost all respondents noted that HSSP pharmacists have a role in specialty medication selection. Disease-specific outcomes were tracked in 95% of responding HSSPs, with 67% reporting that outcomes were used to drive patient monitoring. HSSPs were often involved in continuity of care services such as transitions of care (reported by 89% of respondents), referral to other health-system services (53%), and addressing social determinants of health (60%). Most respondents (80%) reported providing clinical education to specialty clinic staff, including medicine learners (62%). Though only 12% of respondents had dedicated outcomes research staff, many reported annually publishing (47%) or presenting (61%) outcomes research. CONCLUSION: HSSPs are a clinical and educational resource for specialty clinics and have developed robust patient care services that encompass the patient journey from before specialty medication selection through treatment monitoring and optimization.

The role of the pharmacist in the hospital discharge of cancer patients: an integrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer need care from a multidisciplinary team due to the complexity of the clinical picture and proposed treatment. Hospital discharge is a critical step, because pharmacotherapy changes may occur during hospitalization, leading to potential medication-related problems at home. OBJECTIVE: To identify publications which describe the activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer. METHOD: This is an integrative systematic literature review. A search was carried out in the MEDLINE databases, via Pubmed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library, using the following descriptors: "Patient Discharge", "Pharmacists", "Neoplasms." Studies that reported activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer were included. RESULTS: Five hundred and two studies were identified, of which seven met the eligibility criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (n = 3), and the rest in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, and Italy. Among the services provided by the pharmacist at discharge, medication reconciliation was the most widely described. Other activities such as counseling, education, identification, and resolution of drug-related problems were also carried out. CONCLUSION: In the scenario of hospital discharge of patients with cancer, the participation of pharmacists is still to be seen as of significance in regards to publications. Despite this, the results suggest that the actions of this professional contribute to patient orientation and the safe use of prescription drugs for use at home.

The impact of medication reconciliation and review in patients using oral chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Verifying and reviewing a patients medication list can detect and reduce drug related problems (DRPs). However little is known about its effects in patients using oral chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these interventions and the adapted Medication Appropriateness Index (aMAI) as a tool to carry out a medication review. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out. The hospital pharmacist performed a medication reconciliation and medication review, using the aMAI tool, in 54 patients starting oral chemotherapy. Discrepancies, DRP's and associated pharmaceutical interventions were reported via the electronic patient record (EPR). After one month, the acceptance rate was measured and the aMAI score recalculated. Kappa statistics were used to test intra- and interrater reliability. RESULTS: The medication list in the EPR was incomplete in 74,1% of patients with an average of 2.4 errors per patient. After medication review, the aMAI score decreased significantly from 7.2 to 5.4 (SD = 4,7; p <0.001), indicating an improvement in the appropriateness of the drugs patients were taking. Acceptance rates were 41,4% and 53,2% for advices resulting from medication reconciliation and medication review respectively. Kappa values of 0.90 and 0.70 respectively indicate good intra- and interrater reliability. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The study shows that medication reconciliation can identify and address discrepancies. Furthermore, medication review seems to ensure that drug treatment better meets patient needs. The aMAI was a reliable tool. Future research will have to determine the clinical relevance of these interventions.

Use of complete medication history to identify and correct transitions-of-care medication errors at psychiatric hospital admission.

Methods for categorizing the scale and severity of medication errors corrected by pharmacy staff during admission medication reconciliation using complete medication history continue to evolve. We established a rating scale that is effective for generating error reports to health system quality leadership. These reports are needed to quantify the value of investment in transitions-of-care pharmacy staff. All medication errors that were reported by pharmacy staff in the admission medication reconciliation process during a period of 6 months were eligible for inclusion. Complete medication history data source was utilized by admitting providers and all pharmacist staff and a novel medication error scoring methodology was developed. This methodology included: medication error category, medication error type, potential medication error severity, and medication non-adherence. We determined that 82 medication errors were detected from 72 patients and assessed that 74 of these errors may have harmed patients if they were not corrected through pharmacist intervention. Most of these errors were dosage discrepancies and omissions. With hospital system budgets continually becoming leaner, it is important to measure the effectiveness and value of staff resources to optimize patient care. Pharmacists performing admission medication reconciliation can detect subtle medication discrepancies that may be overlooked by other clinician types. This methodology can serve as a foundation for error reporting and predicting the severity of adverse drug events.

Automated unit dose dispensing systems producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacy automation is increasing in hospitals. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the literature on automated unit dose dispensing systems (UDDS) producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients. METHODS: The search was conducted on eight electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline Ovid, and Cinahl, and limited to peer reviewed articles with English abstracts published 2000-2020. Studies were included in the review if drug dispensing was performed by an automated UDDS where individually packaged and labelled unit doses were subsequently assembled patient specifically for inpatients. All outcomes related to UDDS functionality were included with specific interest in medication safety, cost-efficiency and stock management. Outcomes were categorised and results synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS: 664 publications were screened, one article identified manually, resulting in eight included articles. Outcomes of the studies were categorised as medication administration errors (MAEs), dispensing errors, costs and cost-effectiveness. Studies showed that automated UDDS reduced significantly MAEs of inpatients compared with traditional ward stock system (WSS), especially when UDs were dispensed patient specifically by unit dose dispensing robot. Patient specific drug dispensing with automated UDDS was very accurate. Of three different automated medication systems (AMSs), patient specific AMS (psAMS) was the most cost-effective and complex AMS (cAMS) the most expensive system across all error types due to the higher additional investments and operation costs of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). None of the studies investigated the impact on the medication management process such as efficiency, costs and stock management as primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: UDDS improved patient safety. However, automation is a costly investment and the implementation process is complex and time consuming. Further controlled studies are needed on the clinical and economical outcomes of automated UDDS to produce reliable knowledge for hospital decision makers on the cost-benefit of the investment and to support decision making.

Analysis of Pharmacist Interventions in Adult COVID-19 Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background: Pharmacists are integral members of the multidisciplinary healthcare team who, with their skills, knowledge, and training, are well positioned to prevent, identify, and manage medication-related issues. Many published articles related to COVID-19 management have highlighted the important role of the pharmacists in assuring the safe, effective, and cost-effective use of medications. During such challenging times of COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in a high demand on medical resources and healthcare providers, pharmacists are well positioned to contribute and add more efforts to the healthcare system to achieve best use of the available resources including medications and providing high quality pharmaceutical care to help the patients and support the healthcare providers. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review included all admitted adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from 1 March 2020 till 30 June 2020. The documented clinical pharmacist interventions were extracted from the EMR and reviewed by multiple clinical pharmacists to identify type, number, frequency, outcome, and physician's acceptance rate of documented interventions. Results: A total of 484 pharmacist interventions included in the final analysis. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions were the most reported (149, 30.8%) and antibiotics were the most reported class of medication, constituting 31.1% of the total interventions. "Optimized therapy" was the most commonly reported outcome (58.8%). Overall, 50.8% (246) of the interventions were rated as having "moderate" clinical significance using the clinical significance scoring tool. The physicians' acceptance rate was 94.7%. Conclusion: Pharmacist interventions are associated with improved communication and medication use in admitted adult patients with COVID-19. Clinical pharmacists can play a crucial role in optimizing medication use in patients with COVID-19 through prevention, identification, and resolving existing or potential drug-related problems.

Contribution of an anticancer drug compounding robot in reducing the risks of manual preparation in a hospital pharmacy unit specialized in oncology.

INTRODUCTION: In the last few years, pharmaceutical technology has evolved. In the field of oncology pharmacy, robots for the preparation of anti-cancer drugs have appeared to progressively replace manual preparation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the contribution of the robot in reducing the risk of manual preparation. METHODS: The study was conducted at the pharmacy of the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat (May-August 2021). The method used to compare the two types of preparation is the method of analysis of failure modes, their effects and their criticality (FMECA). It will calculate the criticality index (CI = severity × frequency × detectability). The risks have been categorized into human, technical, and environmental risks. RESULTS: The anticancer drugs reconstitution step was the most critical in manual preparation (CI = 126.7) and robotic preparation (CI = 40.7). The robot has made it possible to reduce several CIs of manual preparation including: musculoskeletal disorders of pharmacy operators -93 (89%), error in cancer drug and diluent selection -72 (60%), as well as lack of traceability -145 (97%). CONCLUSION: The preparation robot has made it possible to reduce many of the risks of manual preparation, and constitutes an important advance in the field of oncology pharmacy.

Medication errors in cancer therapy: Reports from German hospital pharmacists between 2008 and 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Since medication errors can have severe consequences, the development of methods to improve patient safety is becoming increasingly important. The aim of this evaluation was to identify frequent medication errors in oncology as well as characteristic correlations in the various error patterns. In addition, the implementation rate of the proposed pharmaceutical intervention was determined in order to assess the benefit of a clinical pharmacist in the field of oncology. METHODS: The evaluation was based on a data-set from a national documentation system for medication errors and interventions (DokuPIK) used by hospital pharmacists in the field of oncology from 2008 to 2019, namely 6684 reported cases in oncology, representing about 5% of all reports in DokuPIK. RESULTS: The most frequently reported errors were incorrect doses (22% of reported errors), followed by interactions (14%); in 10% of errors the prescription/documentation was incomplete/incorrect. The intervention suggested by the pharmacist was implemented in 97% of the cases. Based on the respective Anatomical Therapeutical Chemical Classification (ATC codes), drugs (or groups of drugs) were identified that were reported frequently in connection with medication errors, namely carboplatin and cyclophosphamide as anticancer drugs pantoprazole as non-anticancer drug. CONCLUSION: Frequently occurring medication errors in the field of oncology were identified, facilitating the development of specific recommendations for action and prevention strategies. The implementation of an electronic prescription software is particularly recommended for the avoidance of dosage errors in chemotherapy.

The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and interprofessional ward rounds on drug-related problems at hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: During transitions of care, including hospital discharge, patients are at risk of drug-related problems (DRPs). AIM: To investigate the impact of pharmacist-led services, specifically medication reconciliation at admission and/or interprofessional ward rounds on the number of DRPs at discharge. METHOD: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we analyzed routinely collected data of patients discharged from internal medicine wards of a regional Swiss hospital that filled their discharge prescriptions in the hospital's community pharmacy between June 2016 and May 2019. Patients receiving one of the two or both pharmacist-led services (Study groups: Best Care = both services; MedRec = medication reconciliation at admission; Ward Round = interprofessional ward round), were compared to patients receiving standard care (Standard Care group). Standard care included medication history taken by a physician and regular ward rounds (physicians and nurses). At discharge, pharmacists reviewed discharge prescriptions filled at the hospital's community pharmacy and documented all DRPs. Multivariable Poisson regression analyzed the independent effects of medication reconciliation and interprofessional ward rounds as single or combined service on the frequency of DRPs. RESULTS: Overall, 4545 patients with 6072 hospital stays were included in the analysis (Best Care n = 72 hospital stays, MedRec n = 232, Ward Round n = 1262, and Standard Care n = 4506). In 1352 stays (22.3%) one or more DRPs were detected at hospital discharge. The combination of the two pharmacist-led services was associated with statistically significantly less DRPs compared to standard care (relative risk: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.65). Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation alone showed a trend towards fewer DRPs (relative risk: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.54, 1.03). CONCLUSION: Our results support the implementation of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at admission in combination with interprofessional ward rounds to reduce the number of DRPs at hospital discharge.

Automatic dispensing cabinets and governance of controlled drugs: an exploratory study in an intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Governance of controlled drugs (CDs) in hospitals is resource intensive but important for patient safety and policy compliance. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether and how storing CDs in an automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) in a children's hospital intensive care unit (ICU) contributes to the effectiveness and efficiency of CD governance. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods exploratory study, comprising observations, interviews and audits, 3 months after ADC implementation. We observed 54 hours of medications activities in the ICU medication room (with 42 hours of timed data); interviewed nurses (n=19), management (n=1) and pharmacy staff (n=3); reviewed 6 months of ICU incident reports pertaining to CD governance; audited 6 months of CD register data and extracted logs of all ADC transactions for the 3 months following implementation. Data analysis focused on four main CD governance activities: safekeeping/controlling access, documenting use, monitoring, and reporting/investigating. RESULTS: Nurses and pharmacists perceived spending less time on CD governance tasks with the ADC. The ADC supported CD governance through automated documentation of CD transactions; 'blind counts'; automated count discrepancy checks; electronic alerts and reporting functionalities. It changed quality and distribution of governance tasks, such as removing the requirement for 'nurses with keys' to access CDs, and allowing pharmacists to generate reports remotely, rather than reviewing registers on the ward. For CDs in the ADC, auditing and monitoring appeared to be ongoing rather than periodic. Such changes appeared to create positive reinforcing loops. However, the ADC also created challenges for CD governance. Most importantly, it was not suitable for all CDs, leading to workarounds and parallel use of a safe plus paper registers. CONCLUSIONS: ADCs can significantly alter CDs governance in clinical areas. Effects of an ADC on efficiency and effectiveness of governance tasks appear to be complex, going beyond simple time savings or more stringent controls.

Impact of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice in geriatric inpatients during hospital admission in Vietnam.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs) are common in geriatric patients during care transitions, resulting in frequent undesirable consequences. Medication reconciliation could be a useful practice to prevent or ameliorate UMD. However, this practice in Vietnamese hospitals has not been well established or standardized. This study aims to determine the effect of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice. METHODS: This prospective 6-month pre-and post-study was conducted in two internal medicine wards in a Vietnamese 800-bed public hospital. Pharmacists provided training and short-term support to physicians on medication reconciliation. Primary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with at least one UMD at admission. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with preventable adverse drug events (pADEs) score ≥0.1 due to these UMDs. Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were assessed based on a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred fifty-two patients were recruited in the pre-intervention phase, and 146 in the post-intervention phase. Following the intervention, the proportion of geriatric patients with ≥1 UMD at admission significantly decreased from 55.3 to 25.3 % (ORadj 0.255, 95% CI: 0.151-0.431). Similarly, the proportion of patients with a pADE ≥0.1 at admission reduced from 44.1 to 11.6% [ORadj 0.188, 95% CI: 0.105-0.340] post-intervention. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our pharmacist-initiated educational interventions have demonstrated the ability to produce substantial improvement in medication reconciliation practice, reducing UMDs and potential harm. Our approach may provide an alternate option to implement medication reconciliation for jurisdictions with limited healthcare resources.

Analysis of prescribing error and pharmacist's intervention on obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient prescriptions in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.

Prescribing error in obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) poses harm to women and potentially to the foetus and new born. Pharmacists' interventions have been reported to prevent prescribing error from reaching the patients. Little is reported on the magnitude of prescribing error and pharmacist intervention in a subspecialised outpatient O&G setting. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of prescribing error and pharmacists' interventions at the O&G outpatient setting. This retrospective study involved screening of prescriptions for commission and omission errors. Acceptance, clinical significance and rationale for pharmacists' interventions were analysed. Of the 3883 prescriptions screened, 359 (9.2%) prescriptions contained prescribing error, mainly (52.4%) due to commission errors. Among the 395 interventions performed by the pharmacists, 207 (52.4%) were recorded for omission errors. All the interventions were accepted by the prescribers with 65.1% were categorised as 'very significant'. About 54% of the interventions were conducted to optimise treatment outcome. The prevalence of prescribing error and pharmacists' interventions on O&G outpatient prescriptions was found to be substantial in this study. Standard prescription writing guideline should be routinely regulated, monitored and educated among healthcare professionals. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Prescribing error rate in O&G was found lowest in outpatient setting as compared to inpatient and high risk settings. Pharmacists' intervention performed at the centralised inpatient pharmacy unit or on-ward has shown to reduce prescribing error in inpatient settings.What do the results of this study add? This study identified that the prescribing error rate in a subspecialised outpatient O&G setting was within the range reported in high risk O&G settings. The number of prescriptions to pharmacists' intervention ratio of 9.8:1 was reported.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further research, preferably qualitative in nature, is recommended to explore, identify and address the factors that may hinder clear, accurate and complete prescription writing practices.

Emergency medicine pharmacist interventions reducing exposure to costs (EMPIRE-C).

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Medicine (EM) pharmacists are considered essential healthcare providers in the Emergency Department (ED). Limited data are available representing the types of interventions performed by ED pharmacists, especially in community-based health systems. METHODS: Retrospective, multi-centered, observational review of documented EM clinical pharmacist interventions into the electronic medical record (EMR) across five separate EDs between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Interventions were separated into three categories: ED Intervention, ED Outpatient Culture Review, and ED Discharge Antimicrobial Review. Interventions with supporting literature related to cost avoidance were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 23,794 interventions were logged by the EM pharmacy team between the three categories. Of those, 9181 were cost avoidance interventions resulting in $5,350,755.63 in total cost avoidance, or $582.81 per intervention. CONCLUSION: EM pharmacists practicing in community settings have a substantial impact on patients as evidenced by the large quantity and variety of interventions logged which also results in significant cost avoidance to the healthcare system.

Identification of drug-related problems followed by clinical pharmacist interventions in an outpatient pharmacotherapy clinic.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacotherapy is an essential strategy for the treatment of many medical conditions especially chronic disease and often involves multiple medications being used simultaneously. Increasing the use of medications may pose some challenges to safe and effective drug therapy and if not identified and prevented by the pharmacists eventually can lead to drug-related problems (DRPs). The present study aimed to examine the incidence of DRPs in Iranian patients and to evaluate patients' adherence to the clinical pharmacist interventions as well as the physicians' acceptance of these recommendations. METHODS: This study was conducted in a university-affiliated outpatient pharmacotherapy clinic over a 22-month period. Patients aged 18 years and older with at least one chronic disease receiving at least four medications were included in the study. The patients were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist for comprehensive medication review. DRPs were identified using the DOCUMENT classification system. Recommendations were provided by the clinical pharmacist including interventions involving patient and/or physician to resolve DRPs. The patients were followed up after 2 weeks to evaluate their compliance and physician acceptance of clinical pharmacist recommendations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Two hundred patients were included in this study. Overall, 875 DRPs were identified with an average of 4.37 per patient. The most prevalent DRPs were related to patient education or information (22.8%), undertreated indications (17.4%) and patient compliance (17.2%). The most common drugs associated with DRPs were alimentary and metabolism (22.2% of DRPs) followed by the cardiovascular system (19.2%) and nervous system (9.6%) medications. The DRP incidence correlated with gender only and was higher in females (p = 0.019). The clinical pharmacist provided 912 interventions with an average of 4.56 and 1.04 interventions per patient and per DRPs respectively. Patient education (41.3%), medication initiation or discontinuation (24.5%), and non-pharmacological interventions (12.9%) were the most common clinical pharmacist interventions. Out of 912 interventions, 665 were followed up, out of which 427 were patient dependent and 228 involved physicians. The patient's compliance with clinical pharmacist recommendations was 81.2%. The physician acceptance rate of the recommendations was 44.1%. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The study shows that especially designed services such as pharmacotherapy clinics running by clinical pharmacists are necessary to detect and resolve DRPs in an effective way. The high compliance rate of the patients indicates patients' confidence in the clinical pharmacist services provided in the pharmacotherapy clinic. The low acceptance rate of the physicians highlights the need to improve interprofessional collaboration between clinical pharmacists and physicians in an outpatient setting.